########################################################### testssl.sh 3.0 from https://testssl.sh/ This program is free software. Distribution and modification under GPLv2 permitted. USAGE w/o ANY WARRANTY. USE IT AT YOUR OWN RISK! Please file bugs @ https://testssl.sh/bugs/ ########################################################### Using "OpenSSL 1.0.2-chacha (1.0.2k-dev)" [~183 ciphers] on gandalf:/home/fuero/Appz/testssl.sh/bin/openssl.Linux.x86_64 (built: "Jan 18 17:12:17 2019", platform: "linux-x86_64") Start 2020-02-19 17:59:15 -->> 85.126.106.142:25 (mizar.mag.eu) <<-- rDNS (85.126.106.142): mizar.mag.eu. Service set: STARTTLS via SMTP Testing protocols via sockets SSLv2 not offered (OK) SSLv3 offered (NOT ok) TLS 1 offered (deprecated) TLS 1.1 offered (deprecated) TLS 1.2 offered (OK) TLS 1.3 not offered and downgraded to a weaker protocol Testing cipher categories NULL ciphers (no encryption) not offered (OK) Anonymous NULL Ciphers (no authentication) not offered (OK) Export ciphers (w/o ADH+NULL) not offered (OK) LOW: 64 Bit + DES, RC[2,4] (w/o export) offered (NOT ok) Triple DES Ciphers / IDEA offered Obsolete: SEED + 128+256 Bit CBC cipher offered Strong encryption (AEAD ciphers) offered (OK) Testing robust (perfect) forward secrecy, (P)FS -- omitting Null Authentication/Encryption, 3DES, RC4 PFS is offered (OK) ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA Elliptic curves offered: prime256v1 Testing server preferences Has server cipher order? no (NOT ok) Negotiated protocol TLSv1.2 Negotiated cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 -- inconclusive test, matching cipher in list missing, better see below Negotiated cipher per proto (matching cipher in list missing) ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA: SSLv3, TLSv1, TLSv1.1 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384: TLSv1.2 No further cipher order check has been done as order is determined by the client Testing server defaults (Server Hello) TLS extensions (standard) "renegotiation info/#65281" "EC point formats/#11" "session ticket/#35" "heartbeat/#15" Session Ticket RFC 5077 hint 300 seconds, session tickets keys seems to be rotated < daily SSL Session ID support yes Session Resumption Tickets: yes, ID: yes TLS clock skew Random values, no fingerprinting possible Signature Algorithm SHA256 with RSA Server key size RSA 2048 bits Server key usage Digital Signature, Key Encipherment Server extended key usage TLS Web Server Authentication, TLS Web Client Authentication Serial / Fingerprints C1EF1BDD3E650999BE7A8114A4E7FC02 / SHA1 4418A20B57042BE0FD24CBF81A5677FE63AFF784 SHA256 A2A65517606658C876BB107A89C102E8A6CDA718B6D78082B6B497E1457F7581 Common Name (CN) mizar.mag.eu subjectAltName (SAN) mizar.mag.eu www.mizar.mag.eu Issuer Don Dominio / MrDomain RSA DV CA (Soluciones Corporativas IP, SL from ES) Trust (hostname) Ok via SAN (same w/o SNI) Chain of trust Ok EV cert (experimental) no ETS/"eTLS", visibility info not present Certificate Validity (UTC) 114 >= 60 days (2018-06-13 02:00 --> 2020-06-13 01:59) # of certificates provided 4 Certificate Revocation List http://crl.usertrust.com/DonDominioMrDomainRSADVCA.crl OCSP URI http://ocsp.usertrust.com OCSP stapling not offered OCSP must staple extension -- DNS CAA RR (experimental) not offered Certificate Transparency yes (certificate extension) Testing vulnerabilities Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) not vulnerable (OK), timed out CCS (CVE-2014-0224) not vulnerable (OK) ROBOT not vulnerable (OK) Secure Renegotiation (RFC 5746) supported (OK) Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation VULNERABLE (NOT ok), potential DoS threat CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929) not vulnerable (OK) (not using HTTP anyway) POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566) VULNERABLE (NOT ok), uses SSLv3+CBC (check TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV mitigation below) TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507) Downgrade attack prevention supported (OK) SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329) VULNERABLE, uses 64 bit block ciphers FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) not vulnerable (OK) DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703) not vulnerable on this host and port (OK) make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services https://censys.io/ipv4?q=A2A65517606658C876BB107A89C102E8A6CDA718B6D78082B6B497E1457F7581 could help you to find out LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no DH key detected with <= TLS 1.2 BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) SSL3: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA AES128-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA TLS1: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES256-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA AES128-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 (likely mitigated) LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental potentially VULNERABLE, uses cipher block chaining (CBC) ciphers with TLS. Check patches RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808) VULNERABLE (NOT ok): RC4-SHA Testing 370 ciphers via OpenSSL plus sockets against the server, ordered by encryption strength Hexcode Cipher Suite Name (OpenSSL) KeyExch. Encryption Bits Cipher Suite Name (IANA/RFC) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- xc030 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 ECDH 256 AESGCM 256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 xc028 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 ECDH 256 AES 256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384 xc014 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA ECDH 256 AES 256 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA x9d AES256-GCM-SHA384 RSA AESGCM 256 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 x3d AES256-SHA256 RSA AES 256 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256 x35 AES256-SHA RSA AES 256 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA xc02f ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 ECDH 256 AESGCM 128 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 xc027 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 ECDH 256 AES 128 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 xc013 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA ECDH 256 AES 128 TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA x9c AES128-GCM-SHA256 RSA AESGCM 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 x3c AES128-SHA256 RSA AES 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256 x2f AES128-SHA RSA AES 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA x05 RC4-SHA RSA RC4 128 TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA x0a DES-CBC3-SHA RSA 3DES 168 TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA Running client simulations via sockets Android 8.1 (native) TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) Android 9.0 (native) TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) Android 10.0 (native) TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) Java 6u45 TLSv1.0 RC4-SHA, No FS Java 7u25 TLSv1.0 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) Java 8u161 TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) Java 11.0.2 (OpenJDK) TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) Java 12.0.1 (OpenJDK) TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) OpenSSL 1.0.2e TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) OpenSSL 1.1.0l (Debian) TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) OpenSSL 1.1.1d (Debian) TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) Thunderbird (68.3) TLSv1.2 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256, 256 bit ECDH (P-256) Done 2020-02-19 18:01:03 [ 114s] -->> 85.126.106.142:25 (mizar.mag.eu) <<--